Thursday, October 21, 2010

My domain name is Xinrat. This name was created for me over 20 years ago (when having a TV remote was considered cutting edge technology) by a college roommate, Andrea Kahn. She was an Italian major at UC Davis, while I was enrolled in the German Masters program. At the time, another roommate, Robin, and I were studying Middle High German (a course, which, I now believe, gave me the wherewithal to become a teacher of eighth graders, something that is not for the faint of heart. Neither is studying the great vowel shifts, etc, that occurred in some of the Germanic languages nor the many -zigtausend other lexical changes. But I digress.) Anyhow, one day while reading our Mittelhochdeutsch primer, Der arme Heinrich, (Poor Henry), which was apparently in its time quite the page turner, Robin and I discovered the sound “ee” was represented in Mittelhochdeutsch by the letter “i” with a circumflex over it. For some strange reason, this fascinated us to no end, which, upon reflection some twenty years later, seems to be a rather odd thing to have spent any time on. Perhaps it was because English is so lacking in any letter markers unlike Spanish’s tilde over n, or the use of two, count them two, accents (accent grave and accent aigu) and the cedilla by the French or those high-spirited and happy German umlauts. We shared this with Andrea who, of course, also understood the paucity of letter markers in English, being an Italian major, a language, which also uses its own share of markers. We created names for ourselves, and mine was Xinrat. The “x” stands for the first syllable of my name, “Christ”; the “i” is the long e sound (sadly it is nearly impossible to find an “I” with a circumflex, which is my cross to bear in life, I suppose.); and the “n” for well, the “n” sound at the end of my name. “Rat” refers to my erstwhile pet rats, Anastasia and Phoebe that I had in middle and high school. When Robin and I moved to Germany, one of the friends we made there drew a picture of his interpretation of what a Xinrat looked like. It remains to this day one of the most flattering portraits of me.

I suspect that the three of us just needed to get out more.

A side note: “-zigtausend” is German meaning “lots and lots of “. “Zig “ is the equivalent of our suffix “-ty” that we add to numbers to create twenty, thirty, forty, etc.

Another side note: “Rat” means “advice” in German. I’m still not sure it that means anything. Draw your own conclusions.

Sunday, May 23, 2010

4/1 assignment

Create a new post for your blog which addresses Web Safety in the 21st CenturyClassroom. In your blog posting respond to the questions below: 


1. What technology skills should be acquired by students at the grade level

that you teach?

2. What are the essential elements that should be addressed by an effective classroom technology policy guide for the grade level that you teach?

3. What Internet safety issues should students and parents, at your grade level, be informed of?



By middle school, every student should already have a basic ability to keyboard and to perform common computer tasks like emailing, word processing, etc. Students need to reminded that once out on the Internet, it is extremely important to keep private business just that: private. Actually, a number of adults need to be reminded of that fact as well. they need to be careful what they post... once out in cyberspace, it is there is no way to retrieve what was written


Chapter one: Talk about a poor, little red-headed step child of a paper.

From Outmoded to Moodle

A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the College of Education

Touro University - California

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of

MASTER OF ARTS

in

TEACHING

by

Christine Williams

December 2010

Abstract

It is said of Oscar Wilde that he wished for "...schools beautiful, so beautiful that the punishment for undutiful children should be that they should be debarred from going to school the next day." (Aldington, 1946, p 655) Although Wilde was speaking of the aesthetic of the school's grounds and buildings, it is an interesting idea that a school be such a desirable place to be that the ultimate punishment would be to suspend a student. What appears to be so prevalent in many schools, especially at the secondary level, is a lack of motivation to perform up to ability, to attend on a regular basis, or to be even a part of the learning experience. The traditional classroom is becoming obsolete, and if we as educators are going to improve student participation and learning, we are going to have to examine the best ways in which to do so. The purpose of this project is to investigate the various means of improving student learning via technology and to develop practices that better incorporate technology in the classroom.

There are two questions here: 1) Can the better implementation of technology increase student motivation and learning? and 2) In the classroom, what should stay traditional and what should be on line? In this thesis, the researcher will examine the history and implementation of digital media. Student motivation and improved learning due to digital media will also be examined. This will be done in tandem with streamlining those lessons already using digital media and converting more lessons to digital delivery.

Introduction

“Adapt or die.” As educators today know all to well, the tail end of 20th Century ushered in the newest wave of technology in the classroom. Indeed, it is only growing ever faster in the 21st century, so fast that sometimes the innovations and latest trends appear before there is even an opportunity to assess the efficacy of the older technological developments. Pressure is also being brought to bear on teachers to increase student performance on standardized tests, sometimes to the detriment of inspired and creative teaching. Students, it seems, appear to be less interested in learning for learning’s sake; they want immediate gratification for their performance. Now the latest pressure appears to be merit pay, where a teacher’s compensation will be based on her students’ test performance. So how does a teacher these days meet the rigorous demands of improving test scores, be creative and inspiring despite being hampered by rigid and dull pacing guides (which skim only the surface of a content area or standard), and motivate her students, more and more of whom seem to have a disconnect with school and academics. There are many factors at play here, and the solution to most of these fall outside the scope of this study. However, it appears that the most prudent thing for an educator to do is to use young people’s love and expertise of gadgetry and blending it together with the best teaching practices. By doing so, a real possibility emerges, one in which students are more motivated to learn, teachers can overcome the ponderous pacing guides by injecting creativity and inspiration back into teaching, and performance, both in the classroom and on the tests, improves. This researcher believes that for future success, a hybridized classroom, one that combines technology and traditional teaching, is the best way to achieve this.

Problem

Currently in California the emphasis on standardized testing has only increased. Unfortunately, the next spanner in the works appears to be basing teacher compensation on their students’ performances. No matter how much this idea of merit pay based on test scores is sorely misguided in this researcher’s opinion, there seems to be little point in hoping it will simply go away. Policymakers appear to be disinterested in a better application of these funds, i.e., paying the money based on performance to the students who took the tests. In Vacaville Unified School District where the researcher has taught primarily eighth grade Language Arts for twenty-one years, she has seen a steady decrease in student performance and motivation to do their best. One of the biggest roadblocks to improving their motivation and performance level is the district’s policy of social promotion for K8 pupils, or, as many of the teachers call it, “Failure is an option” policy. If an eighth grader knows he need not work in any of his classes and will be promoted with full freshman standing the next year, provided he receives a D- in either Language Arts or math, there is no reason for him to apply himself. This leads, of course, to lowered performance on the STAR tests. This is due primarily for two reasons: one, they have not applied themselves during the year and don’t know the content as well as they should, and two, students know that the score will not affect their grades, therefore, there is no reason to try their best on the tests. It is no wonder that most of the schools in the district, if not all, are in program improvement, including this researcher’s school, Willis Jepson Middle School. In 2009-2010, Jepson entered its fourth year of program improvement (School Accountability Report Card 2008-2009, Jepson Middle School). It is the researcher’s belief that, although this district’s promotion policy as regards K8 pupils needs to change, it won’t, and so it is necessary for her to strike out and create a learning environment that increasing student performance.

Background and Need

When most people now think of technology in the classroom, for most, the computer comes to mind. However, teachers have been using technology for a great deal longer than classroom computers were even conceived of, let alone implemented. In the early part of the twentieth century, teachers began to use film in their instruction (Cuban, 1986, p. 12). Cuban cites two surveys (albeit somewhat flawed, in Cuban's opinion) conducted by the NEA to investigate how widespread the usage of film in the classroom was. The first survey conducted in 1946 found that the frequency with which film was used was relatively the same at both the elementary and junior high school level. By senior high school, the frequency of usage had dropped with 20.7% of teachers reporting film was used frequently as opposed to 37.5% in the elementary grades and 34.9% in junior high. (Cuban, 1986, pp. 14 -16) The second survey was held in 1954. In both the secondary and elementary levels, usage in the classroom had increased slightly in secondary schools from 20.7% to 23% teachers reporting frequent use. 42 % of elementary teachers reported using film frequently, again a slight increase over the results from the 1946 survey. (Cuban, 1986, p. 16). Interestingly enough, the reasons given for the infrequent or no use of film as an instructional tool seem to echo the reasons given today for the lack of integration of technology in the classroom: teachers lacking the skills necessary to implement film in their integration of films curriculum; expense that film entailed; not enough equipment to go around; and the search to find the best films to fit a teacher's content area. (Cuban, 1986, p. 18). These are the same problems facing teachers today: lack of skills, lack of money; equal access; and appropriate materials.

The use of radio in the classroom soon followed the introduction of film as an instructional tool in schools. Unlike films, which were shown when the teacher determined, there were broadcasts given at certain times of the day to which the teachers tuned in. (Cuban, 1986, p.19 - 24) As with films in the classroom, there were many of the same roadblocks present when it came to implementing radio broadcasts, and the demand for such broadcasts was short-lived. (Cuban, 1986, p. 25 - 26). Television was the next technological innovation, and it now standard equipment in most public schools along with DVD players and VCRs. They have become as ordinary as pencil sharpeners and whiteboards. One would think that in reading these first two paragraphs that the purpose of this project would be to flee from the use of technology in the classroom. It is true that the same problems that hampered easy inclusion of the early forms of technology are still present. So given all the negatives and pitfalls of using technology in the classroom up until now, why integrate more of it into the classroom?

The difference between then and now may lie in this: there is one change that was not as significant then, and that is the booming use of technology by people, especially the younger generation. According to a project by the Pew Research Center, "Social Media and Mobile Internet Use Among Teens and Young Adults," teens and young adults comprise the two largest groups (93%) for whom the "... internet is a central and indispensable element in [their] live..." (Lenhart, Purcell, Smith, and Zickuhr, 2009, p. 5) When it comes to computer ownership (laptop or desktop), more teens than not have computers. The study notes that "Nearly seven in ten (69%) teens ages 12 - 17 have a computer." (Lenhart, Purcell, Smith, and Zichuhr, 2009, p. 10) This intertwining of technology with this latest generation's life style is not going to change; in fact, it is believed by some that this group, the "Millennials," may be "reshaping the nation..." (Lenhart, Purcell, Smith, and Zickuhr, 2009)

So how are teachers adapting to the advancements in technology and use in the classroom? According to a recent survey by Grunwald Associates, LLC, teachers still are using the old standbys of televisions, video players, etc. (traditional media). However, more and more teachers are now coming on board with more up-to-date digital media such as social networking and virtual professional communities. (Digitally Inclined, 2009, p. 1) The teachers who were using digital media with their students more and more felt that there were two benefits to doing so: being more effective as teachers and creating more effective learners. (Digitally Inclined, 2009, p. 5). And even when teachers use traditional media, the survey revealed that teachers have become better at incorporating television and video (traditional media) into the classroom. Among the reasons given for using these media, 76 % of the teachers polled stated it "increases student motivation," while 87% of them claimed it "reinforces and expands on the content they are teaching." 76% of the teachers also said that it "helps them respond to a variety of learning styles." Among the benefits that are reaped by using television and video, the poll listed that 49% felt it made them more effective in the classroom. (Digitally Inclined, 2009, p. 8). Clearly, there is merit in not only improving the classroom use of traditional media, but also in the development of digital media.

Recent studies seem to bear out the teachers' claims that the implementation of more modern technological developments does increase student learning and motivation. According to a study of his own classes taught at Houston University, Brian McFarlin found that learning and performance were increased for those students who participated in a hybrid course. He compared the performance of 658 students he had taught a single course on the physiology. 348 students who took the traditional course, while 312 took the hybrid class. He found that students in the hybrid class did much better than those in the traditional setting. On the first exam, the hybrid class's students scored 10% higher; on the second exam, these same students scored 17.8% higher. This averaged out to a total of all scores with the hybrid class students having better scores by14.0% than those enrolled in a traditional university lecture class. His final findings indicate that an 83% improvement in grades was due to those students taking a hybrid class. (McFarlin, 2008, p. 89 -90)

McFarlin's findings are also borne out by a study on motivation in a hybrid course conducted at a Turkish University. What is interesting about Omer Delialioglu's paper is his discovery that a student's source of motivation was also a factor. Those students motivated intrinsically tending to enjoy the hybrid course better than those who were extrinsically motivated. He interviewed individually each of the twenty-five students enrolled in hybrid course on computer networks and communication in 2002 at Middle Eastern Technical University. The students who were motivated extrinsically tended to have a less positive opinion of the course than those intrinsically motivated. (Delialioglu, 2004, p.271) So while a hybridized class can improve motivation, a teacher needs to be conscious of her students' sources of motivation. Are they extrinsic (good grades, for example) or intrinsic (love of learning)?

It is apparent that there is a real need to restructure the way in which lessons are presented. This generation and the ones that follow are different in their learning behaviors due to the increasing reliance on various technological developments like texting, I-Pods, cell phones, the Internet, etc. While the content of any subject may remain the same, the approach must change if teachers are going to effective in disseminating their curriculum.

Purpose

The purpose of this thesis project is to explore the various types of technology used in the classroom from the most basic types (television, VCRs, and DVD players) to advanced types like hybridized classrooms or completely virtual education. It is this researcher's hope that there will two positives outcomes from this project. The first outcome hoped for is using technology to reduce the amount of paperwork, improve parent/teacher communication, and ease the workload. The second and more important desired outcome is to improve student participation and motivation in the learning process, thereby increasing their level of knowledge and rate of success on standardized tests as well as in the classroom.

Willis Jepson Middle School, where the researcher works, is located in the town of Vacaville, California, a community of approximately 100,000 people. Up until about thirty-five years ago, Vacaville was a small town along the Interstate 80 corridor between the Bay Area and Sacramento, but the cost of housing in the Bay Area as well as the building of a state prison in Vacaville created an abrupt and rapid growth in this once small town. Willis Jepson, a junior high school in town, underwent restructuring when the student population grew so large that a second high school was needed. The second junior high school, Will C. Wood, was turned into a 9 - 12 high school, an elementary school, Vaca Pena, was converted to a 7/8 middle school, and Jepson became a 7/8 middle school as well, losing its ninth grade class to what had been the town's only high school, Vacaville High.

The population consists of 1042 students. The ethnic/racial groups break down as follows: African American (6.43%), Amerindian/Alaskan Native (0.77%), Asian (1.92%), Filipino (1.44%), Latino (26.39%), Pacific Islander (0.67%) , white (52.88%), and multiple or no response (9.50%) (School Accountability Report Card, 2008 -2009, Jepson Middle School). Some of the students also fall into one or more groups: socioeconomically disadvantaged (32.00%), English learners (10.00%), and students with disabilities (11.00%) (SARC 2008-2009, Jepson Middle School).

As regards technology, Willis Jepson offers two one-semester long courses. Computer technology introduces students to basic computer usage and application. Video production and web design focuses on digital video production. Students produce the "daily school news" as well as create public service announcements to promote good behavior and to promote events. From 2001 to 2003, Jepson underwent extensive renovations, which included a new updated classroom for the technology classes as well as a computer lab. Prior to that time, students had access to a small number of computers in the school's library. All the classrooms currently have at least one computer, which is for teacher use. A few classroom have one to three or so extra computers for student use; these are used primarily for Accelerated Reader or Math programs. These AR/AM computers were purchased approximately six years ago with funds from a grant the school had received. Unfortunately, the funds no longer exist, and many of these computers are becoming more and more obsolete. The computers all have Internet access. In addition to computers, many of the classrooms now have projectors connected to the teacher's computer and are used to project such programs like Brain Pop or web streaming from EdStop1. The computer lab can seat up to 35 students. It is underutilized at this point. Some teachers use at the beginning and end of the year for AR testing; other teachers use it a few times each quarter throughout the year. Many of the teachers on site have either never used it or have only used it very sporadically since its inception. Still, should a teacher wish to create a hybridized classroom, there would be enough access to computers for students.

Objectives

The project will be divided into two main steps. First, the researcher will gather information about the various uses of technology, so that she may begin improving what technology she has already implemented and also begin the creation and/or transfer of standard based lessons based on the Explicit Direct Instruction model from DataWORKS to be presented via PowerPoint, podcasts, and other sorts of more modern means of presentation. She will also begin using the district's current grading/communication program, School Loop. Secondly, the researcher will create her own Moodle in order to provide eventually information regarding assignments, be it downloading work, providing lessons for those students who were absent, creating student/teacher forms, etc. The final outcome should be a hybridized classroom, one that combines the best of the traditional, or face-to-face, classroom with the best of e learning.

Definition of Terms

These terms come from a variety of sources. These are listed at the end of each definition.

1. DataWORKS: The main focus of DataWORKS Educational Research is to work with schools in order to be more successful at teaching the different content areas in the hopes that test scores will improve. (From DataWORKS website)

2. digital media: These are the new advancements in media like podcasts, the Web, interactive games, etc. (From PBS report: Digitally Inclined.)

3. Explicit Direct Instruction: A method for teachers to develop more efficient and effective

lesson plans. It has eight components: Checking for Understanding; Learning Objective;

Activate Prior Knowledge; Concept Development; Skill Development; Importance; Explaining, Modeling & Demonstrating; and Guided Practice. (From DataWORKS website)

4. hybrid (hybridized) classroom: A cross between traditional, or face-to-face, classroom instruction and online learning.

5. social networks: Internet communities that were created by people who have similar interests. (From PBS report: Digitally Inclined).

6. traditional media: Media like television, video and tape recorders, radio, etc. (From PBS report: Digitally Inclined.)

Summary

Chapter one contains the rationale for the researcher's desire to create a Moodle for her classroom. By doing so, she hopes to improve student learning by motivating them through the use of technology. Given the pressure on teachers to improve test scores and the reality that our students are part of the digital nation, it is necessary for teachers to adapt their methods of instruction to retain student interest, promote student motivation, and increase student learning in all content areas.

Prior to creating a Moodle, the researcher will also investigate and then implement those practices (PowerPoint, for example) that best engage students. Much of the teaching style will evolve over time... moving more and more away from a purely traditional classroom to a hybrid.

References

Aldington, R. (1946) The Portable Oscar Wilde. New York, NY: Viking Press.

Cuban, L. (1986) Teachers and Machines: the Classroom Use of Technology since 1920. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Delialioglu, O. (2004) Investigation of Source of Motivation in a Hybrid Course. Middle East Technical University. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 27th, Chicago, IL, October 19-23, 2004.

Lenhart, A., K. Purcell, A. Smith, and K. Zichuhr (2010). Social Media & Mobile Internet Use Among Teens and Young Adults. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.

McFarlin, B. (2008) Hybrid lecture-online format increases student grades in an undergraduate exercise physiology course at a large urban university. American Physiological Review 32: 86 - 91.

Mertler, C. (2009) Action Research: Teachers as Researchers in the Classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

PBS. (2009) Digitally Inclined. (Grunwald Associates, LLC). Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/teachers/_files/pdf/annual-pbs-survey-report.pdf

School Accountability Report Card. (2009) School Accountability Report Card -- Willis Jepson Middle School (2002 - 2009).

Sunday, May 9, 2010

EdTech 742 Book Review

EdTech 742 Book Review Christine Williams

Book: Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920

Author: Larry Cuban, Stanford University

Published: 1986, Teachers College, Columbia University

In his acknowledgments section of the book, Cuban states that this book the result of a "wedding between research and experience." He has been a classroom teacher, a superintendent, and is currently a professor at Stanford University. He is interested in the use of technology and in how teachers teach. Cuban is not anti-technology, but he is concerned that those in charge have little understanding of the art of teaching. Technology is a good tool, but one cannot just cram it into the schools without asking if this will truly improve education. He hopes that this book will help "practitioners, researchers, and policymakers understand better the classroom as a workplace."

The introduction opens with Cuban decrying the all too common assumption that teachers are the roadblocks to improving public schools. He says that teachers are faced with societal demands that are in opposition to one another. These "contradictions" as he calls them have made teaching more and more conflicted. He cites four examples of these contradictions teachers must contend with:

Socialize all children, yet nourish each child's individual creativity; teach the best that the past has to offer, but insure that each child possesses practical skills marketable in the community; demand obedience to authority, but encourage individual children to think and question; cultivate cooperation, but prepare children to compete.

Cuban argues that too often policymakers, businessmen, administrators, etc. see technology as the magic solution to all of education's woes. Of course, when the teachers don't use the equipment, as it is perceived they should, they are attacked as the barrier to reform. No one, he counters, even seems to ask whether this sort of technology (whatever it is) would be of benefit nor does anyone seem to look into the reasons behind why some sort of technology is being pushed so hard. He believes it a failure on the part of the reformers, policymakers, and administrators not to include the "teacher's perspective" when it comes to purchasing any sort of equipment and that this failure didn't start with computers in the latter half of the twentieth century but rather at the beginning.

The book is divided into four chapters and proceeds chronologically. Chapter one covers film and radio. Chapter two discusses instructional television. Chapter three focuses on how teachers use machines in the classroom, and chapter four examines the "promise of computers." Cuban points out throughout the book that no matter the technological innovation there never seems to be enough long-term study of its efficacy. Of course, at the time this book was written, computers were limited in their scope and availability to classrooms everywhere. His basic premise as regards "machines" in the classroom is that they can be of use (provided there is proper training, access, and support for all teachers involved AND that there is a demonstrable need for the equipment). However, Cuban is worried that policymakers, etc. are too eager to try some new thing without thinking it through and throw all the older, established methodologies of teaching out the window.

I see where Cuban is coming from. I have witnessed countless dollars wasted, not just on equipment or technology, but also on workshops and trainings on any number of topics. Everyone jumps on some educational bandwagon every few years: "Let's all try this new thing!" It is frustrating to attend seminars or get equipment, but never get enough training or support or even access to the necessary materials. However, I think Cuban is overly worried about technology in the classroom. I would like to see a happy medium. I do believe technology can assist teaching very much, but I don't believe it replaces everything. Like Cuban, I want to see evidence of its effectiveness before a district goes out and invests thousands of dollars in a program, hardware, software, etc. I also think that teachers need to be more open to the change and application of technology. Perhaps by keeping what good teaching practice and melding it with new teaching methods via technology may make it possible to do what society demands in the classroom, i.e., the very "contradictions" Cuban refers to in his introduction.

Webinar: Teaching and Learning with Digital Natives"

Ed 742 Christine Williams

Webinar

I was unable to attend the lecture at Touro in February, so this is the webinar I viewed as a make up assignment. I found this Webinar on PBS Teachers. It was presented on Elluminate. The name of the Webinar is "Teaching and Learning with Digital Natives." The following blurb is quoted directly from the site:

John Palfrey, director of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University, discusses his new book, Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. The discussion focuses on how this population interacts with information, institutions and each other in new ways. Participants also learn about the need for educators to become familiar with the technologies of digital natives and use these technologies to compliment their pedagogy.

The hour long Webinar, hosted by Jenny Bradbury (PBS Teachers) and Steve Hargadon (Classroom 2.0), aired on February 26, 2009. John Palfrey was interviewed about his book, which he co-authored with Urs Gasser. The webinar opened with Palfrey explaining why Born Digital was written and the way in which the research was done. They wrote the book to present the best research on how young people use technology and to "bring to light" the best practices and uses of technology in regards to young people. The book is intended for both parents and teachers. The authors also wanted to debunk some of the myths regarding technology and youth. The authors researched their subject in two ways. Firstly they looked at what other researchers had already done in this area, both qualitatively and quantitatively. These studies came from the PEW, Oxford University, and American Life Group among many others. The authors also performed a comprehensive literature review. Palfrey called their research "building on the shoulders of giants." They also conducted their own research, primarily focus groups and interviews, using a qualitative approach. They started with surveys, which led to focus groups. The focus groups led to having some in-depth interviews with some of the participants. The research was held all over the world: the US, Europe, the Gulf region (Bahrain), and Asia (China, Korea, and Japan).

The talk was then interrupted by an audience poll, posing the question "How native are you?" The results of the six questions posed are presented below:

1. Do you write or post original text online, using blogs, wikis, twitter, or other publishing tool? YES 45%

2. Do you create and post images, video, audio, or other forms of multimedia online? YES 56%

3. Do you belong to a social network? YES 52%

4. Do you participate in virtual worlds? YES 10%

5. Do you play online games? YES 26%

6. Have you searched for yourself on Google, pipl, etc.? YES 75%

Palfrey was asked to define what a digital native is. He replied a digital native was defined as typically someone born after 1980 when the social digital technologies came online (Palfrey himself was born in 1972). Digital natives all have access to networked digital technologies and have the skills to use them. This led to the debunking of the first myth.

Myth I: Digital Natives are a generation.

Palfrey called this an "overstatement." He pointed out that out of six billion people, only one billion have access. He stated further that this could be broken down along socio-economical lines, with the more affluent people having better access. He claimed that some older people (non natives) use technology just as well as the natives. He called them "digital settlers." Apparently it is more a state of mind than a group of young people.

Myth II: Digital Natives are more endangered.

Of course, Palfrey stated there are some safety issues, so it is partly true. He continued to say that young people need guidance from teachers and parents so they can learn how to navigate the digital world. Like in the "good old days" it is still difficult for young people to make good decisions without proper training. Young people need to be taught how to manage their personal information, especially online. Palfrey said that the adults should approach the issue by having "a combination of common sense and online experience is key." Interestingly enough, the biggest fears people have -- sexual predators and access to porn online-- are still a concern, but not more so than they were prior to the Internet. Palfrey went on to explain that he had chaired a nationwide taskforce checking on the dangers of technology. One thing they discovered was that from 1990 to the present day the chances of someone becoming a victim of a sexual predator are going down. Palfrey believes this may be due to the fact that the victims and the predators are meeting online and not in public where abuse could take place. He did warn that chat rooms and instant messaging were the places young people might hook up with predators. As far as online porn was concerned, he commented that young people certainly had the ability to do so, but apparently they weren't tapping into it as believed. Palfrey said there is a need for better filters for home computers, but he also noted that some people feel such filters are pointless at schools. Palfrey mentioned cyber bullying as a rising problem due to all the psychological damage that can be done to someone and that it needs to be addressed. However, he wished to discuss this further later on in the interview in myth four.

The discussion then turned to copywrite laws and all the regulations surrounding them. Palfrey believes these laws, rules, and regulations need to evolve with the times. It is becoming harder and harder to determine what is fair use and what is pirating or plagiarism. Palfrey stated that the researchers were unable to debunk the belief that artists are being ripped off by illegal downloads. Palfrey believes that a person's work and ideas should be protected, but as technology grows, our rules need to grow with it.

Myth III: Digital Natives are less intelligent and less informed.

Palfrey started the discussion on myth three as follows:

"Our children find information in digital formats and are processing it in ways that those who came before them could only have imagined. The information is sometimes surrounded by far less context than in the past, while at other times, it surrounded by more. Our challenge is to help them make sense of these new contexts and new meanings, and to think synthetically and critically, rather than letting them lose their way."

Ironically, Palfrey noted, that at the same time Born Digital was coming out, another book also was published claiming that the current generation was the stupidest ever. Palfrey called this debate a "cultural war [that is] emerging regarding technology's influence on the latest generation." One complaint that many teachers have is students cutting and pasting documents from sites like Wikipedia and creating a report out of it. The researchers asked students how they would conduct research. All of them said they would Google the subject (the researchers used the Spanish American War or Lou Gehrig's disease as hypothetical subjects) and see where it took them. What the researchers found was that the "least sophisticated" students would just cut and paste which typically resulted in a low grade. The savvier students were more careful. They used other sources to see if the first source was correct. Palfrey would like to see teachers redirect students when it appears technology is interfering with learning. He suggested teachers should also require students cite from books, etc. when doing research. Palfrey stated that tech users need to know when it's okay to go surfing for quick information and when technology actually harms learning. One interesting side note: Palfrey mentioned that some neuroscientists now believe the brain is being rewired to cope with the digital world.

Myth IV: Digital Natives are more prone to bullying and anti-social behavior.

Palfrey said that the key to proving whether this is a myth or not lies in the definition of bullying. He posed the question: how do we tell the difference between true bullying and teasing? One problem, he noted, is that people will write in cyberspace things they would never say in person. He believes young people aren't any meaner than any other generation has been, but the problem comes about because cyber bullying spreads rapidly to a huge audience. The nasty comments also stick around much longer than angry words said at school, making it difficult to get rid of. This makes it very easy to hurt someone badly. Palfrey was asked if this group engages itself differently. He commented that they like their digital social life and can become quite upset if they are separated from their technology for too long.

The discussion between Palfrey and the moderators ended at this point. Participants then were able to send questions for Palfrey to answer. At the end of the program, it was mentioned that Born Digital is part of a larger study and more information can be accessed at the following sites:

http://www.digitalnative.org/wiki/Main Page

http://blog.law.harvard.edu/digitalnatives

and

http://www.digitalnative.org#video

I truly enjoyed the discussion. I had thought it would be dreadfully dull and boring, but I was pleasantly surprised. I am now interested in reading more of Palfrey's writings.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Reflections on technology and student advancement


I have to be honest. I know so little about what is out there. In my limited scope, I have found the ability to download information from my computer to my projector a very good tool. Of course, the smart boards are great... I always hated losing good classroom discussion from one period to the next. Now there are podcasts... you can create lessons for your students to study or review. They can create their own podcasts as well. I'm not so sure about Twitter or Facebook, but that's probably because I find Facebook confusing and well... I don't own a cell phone... (can I share that fact in a tech class without the risk of censure and condemnation of my peers?)... so Twitter is out. I like the idea of a blog site for communication. Isn't there also a pencil-like tool that students can use for reading? An interactive pen.

Here is a site for Brightlink which can make nearly every wall interactive without having to have a smart board:

http://www.epsonbrightlink.webengager.com/?ref=brightlink&s_kwcid=TC%7C18614%7Cschool%20technology%7C%7CS%7C%7C4035386
442&gclid=CIuXhJP5wKACFQ8bawodlV0FTg

The stuff seems to change so rapidly we poor old digital immigrants never seem to be able to keep up.

Reflection on searches and social networking

In your second reflectionreflect on how can technology support student understanding and building of knowledge? Explain what types of products do you feel can inspire creativity and innovation?

I think I already talked about this in my first post to this blog. What I had written was as follows:

I am concerned that while the young people have mastered the technology of this age, they have forgotten the responsibility and the dangers that go along with it. Just recently another teacher was suspended for postings on Facebook. And these postings don't even have to be your own. A response or a comment from a facebook friend could get one in trouble. My friend who is an administrator in Napa spoke to me recently about the trouble they are experiencing with "sexting" and students. Some of the kids have even been charged with felony child pornography for sexting. And so, while having these abilities are nice, there is a very frightening potential for very serious misuse. And that has been probably true for every human innovation: the potential for positive human advancement or the potential for negative human interactions.

It seems schools and society in general (digitally savvy or not) must instill in young people certain moral standards that every generation has needed, albeit the Stone Age or the 21st century.

So basically a student needs to know the basics of how a computer functions... keyboarding, cutting/pasting, saving, etc. He also needs instruction on manuevering his way around the 'Net and the 'Netiquette needed for appropriate inaction with others on the Internet, websites, what have you. This is in addition to what I touched on in an earlier post.